Welcome to the Creatures Wiki! Log in and join the community.

Difference between revisions of "Creatures Wiki talk:Tasks"

From Creatures Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New Tasks?)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:Indeed, if they '''''do''''' want to know what is on the website, separating it off into another page will just mean they have to click on a link and actively wait for it to load, while if it is on the same page and it's loaded in the background they just keep reading. In that case, it takes both more  bandwidth and more time for the user. --{{UT|GreenReaper}} 21:48, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
 
:Indeed, if they '''''do''''' want to know what is on the website, separating it off into another page will just mean they have to click on a link and actively wait for it to load, while if it is on the same page and it's loaded in the background they just keep reading. In that case, it takes both more  bandwidth and more time for the user. --{{UT|GreenReaper}} 21:48, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
 +
 +
== New Tasks? ==
 +
 +
Are people allowed to add new tasks?<br />
 +
[[User:GameFreak|GameFreak]] 00:53, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:53, 20 June 2005

Proposal: To list the downloads available at each website, whilst still keeping the website's page relatively short, we could have 'Websitename (TOC)' pages that record a table of contents for the site's downloads and articles. - Don 21:34, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)

It's possible, but why split it? Probably the table of contents should not be the first section on the page if it is excessively long (just in case people don't want to bother scrolling down to see the interesting bits), but I see no harm in having long pages per se, given that users will probably be busy reading the top of the page while the bottom is loading. I don't think we have any bandwidth limits at this time. :-)
Indeed, if they do want to know what is on the website, separating it off into another page will just mean they have to click on a link and actively wait for it to load, while if it is on the same page and it's loaded in the background they just keep reading. In that case, it takes both more bandwidth and more time for the user. --GreenReaper(talk) 21:48, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)

New Tasks?

Are people allowed to add new tasks?
GameFreak 00:53, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)